A COMPARISON OF PORPHYRA-DIOICA SP. NOV. AND PORPHYRA-PURPUREA (ROTH)C. AG. (RHODOPHYTA, BANGIOPHYCIDAE) IN EUROPE

Citation
J. Brodie et Lm. Irvine, A COMPARISON OF PORPHYRA-DIOICA SP. NOV. AND PORPHYRA-PURPUREA (ROTH)C. AG. (RHODOPHYTA, BANGIOPHYCIDAE) IN EUROPE, Cryptogamie. Algologie, 18(3), 1997, pp. 283-296
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences","Marine & Freshwater Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01811568
Volume
18
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
283 - 296
Database
ISI
SICI code
0181-1568(1997)18:3<283:ACOPSN>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
This paper describes two species previously confused under the name Po rphyra purpurea (Roth) C. Ag. sensu late: Porphyra dioica sp. nov. and P. purpurea sensu stricto. The holotype (BM) of I dioica is from Sidm outh, Devon, England and the proposed neotype (BM) of P. purpurea is f rom Nord-Ost Watt, Helgoland. Porphyra dioica is characterised by havi ng olive-green to purple-brown, frequently laciniate, lanceolate to br oadly ovate fronds which fold in half when held vertically; it is dioe cious with marginal sori; spermatangial packets contain 64 spermatangi a; carposporangial packets contain 8 carpospores. Porphyra purpurea se nsu stricto is characterised by having brown to reddish-brown, usually entire, elliptical to obovate fronds; it is monoecious with male and female sori separated by a distinct line; spermatangial packets contai n 64-128 spermatangia; carposporangial packets contain 16 carpospores. Carpospores of both species develop into a filamentous ''Conchocelis' '-phase. Ecological differences are also apparent, with P. dioica occu rring in the lower midlittoral of more exposed shore regions, and P. p urpurea in the midlittoral of more sheltered locations.