Fentanyl and its analogs are eliminated slowly by patients having abdo
minal aortic surgery. This is principally due to larger volumes of dis
tribution, compared to the pharmacokinetics determined in other surgic
al patients. Midazolam, like these opioids, is a lipophilic organic ba
se, suggesting that it may also have a larger volume of distribution i
n patients undergoing abdominal aortic reconstruction. The pharmacokin
etics of intravenous midazolam, 0.25 mg/kg, were determined in patient
s undergoing elective infrarenal abdominal aortic surgery. The mean (/-SD) age of the patients was 66.7 +/- 9.2 yr, and their mean weight w
as 74.3 +/- 12.7 kg. Blood samples were drawn at increasing intervals
for 24 h after administration of midazolam, and serum midazolam concen
trations were measured by gas-liquid chromatography. A 3 compartment m
odel best described the concentration versus time data. Simulations of
the times required for 20%, 50%, and 80% decreases in midazolam conce
ntrations after stopping an infusion that maintains a constant plasma
midazolam concentration were performed, comparing pharmacokinetic vari
ables from this study with previously published values. Metabolic clea
rance was 361 +/- 97 mL/min. Rapid intercompartmental clearance was 21
97 +/- 997 mL/min and slow intercompartmental clearance, 481 +/- 225 m
L/min. The volume of the central compartment (V-c) and the volume of d
istribution at steady state (Vd(ss)) were 5.8 +/- 5.3 L and 118.2 +/-
70.4 L, respectively The elimination half-life was 6.3 +/- 3.6 h, 1.5-
to 3-fold longer than has been previously reported in patients underg
oing surgery. Compared to previously published studies of other groups
of patients, metabolic clearance of midazolam was slower in patients
undergoing abdominal aortic surgery. The Vd(ss) was in the upper part
of the range of previously reported values. Simulations predicting the
times required for 20%, 50%, and 80% decreases in midazolam concentra
tions after continuous infusions indicate that, under most conditions,
the concentrations would not decrease more slowly in our patients, in
spite of the longer elimination half-life. Although midazolam is elim
inated more slowly in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery, th
ese simulations suggest that this would not lengthen the time required
for the midazolam concentrations to decrease below pharmacologically
active levels after moderate doses. This is apparently due to relative
ly faster redistribution, due to a greater intercompartmental clearanc
e: V-c ratio, and relatively greater capacity for redistribution of mo
derate doses, indicated by a greater Vd(ss):V-c ratio, as compared to
patients undergoing nonaortic surgery.