SUBCUTANEOUSLY VERSUS SUBFASCIALLY ADMINISTERED LIDOCAINE IN PAIN TREATMENT AFTER INGUINAL HERNIOTOMY

Citation
S. Yndgaard et al., SUBCUTANEOUSLY VERSUS SUBFASCIALLY ADMINISTERED LIDOCAINE IN PAIN TREATMENT AFTER INGUINAL HERNIOTOMY, Anesthesia and analgesia, 79(2), 1994, pp. 324-327
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00032999
Volume
79
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
324 - 327
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2999(1994)79:2<324:SVSALI>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
We conducted a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial to compare the efficacy of subfascial (SF) versus subcutaneous (SC) lidocaine (10 mL 1%) given in the wound postoperatively through a catheter placed i n the respective layer intraoperatively. The initial pain scores were similar in the two groups before injection of lidocaine. In the SC gro up, there was a reduction in pain scores during rest from 4 to 3 (P > 0.05), during cough from 6 to 5 (P > 0.05), and during mobilization fr om 7 to 5.5 (P > 0.05) at 15 min. In the SF group, the reductions in p ain scores were from 4 to 2 (P < 0.05), from 6 to 3 (P < 0.05), and fr om 7 to 3 (P < 0.05), respectively. Supplemental analgesics after the lidocaine administration were needed earlier in the SC group than in t he SF group (P < 0.01). We conclude that postoperative pain treatment with local lidocaine application after herniotomy has a better effect when applied in the SF, rather than the SC, layer.