We consider a model of the stock market with delegated portfolio manag
ement. Managers try, but sometimes fail, to discover profitable tradin
g opportunities. Although it is best not to trade in this case, their
clients cannot distinguish ''actively doing nothing,'' in this sense,
from ''simply doing nothing.'' Because of this problem, (i) some portf
olio managers trade even though they have no reason to prefer one asse
t to another (noise trade). We also show that (ii) the amount of such
noise trade can be large compared to the amount of hedging volume. Per
haps surprisingly, (iii) noise trade may be Pareto-improving, Noise tr
ade may be viewed as a public good. Results i and ii are compatible wi
th observed high levels of turnover in securities markets. Result iii
illustrates some of the possible subtleties of the welfare economics o
f financial markets. In our model, all agents are rational: some trade
for hedging reasons, investors optimally contract with portfolio mana
gers who may have stock-picking abilities, and portfolio managers trad
e optimally given the incentives provided by this contract.