Jw. Segura et al., URETERAL STONES CLINICAL GUIDELINES PANEL SUMMARY REPORT ON THE MANAGEMENT OF URETERAL CALCULI, The Journal of urology, 158(5), 1997, pp. 1915-1921
Purpose: The American Urological Association convened the Ureteral Sto
nes Clinical Guidelines Panel to analyze the literature regarding avai
lable methods for treating ureteral calculi and to make practice polic
y recommendations based on the treatment outcomes data. Materials and
Methods: The panel searched the MEDLINE data base for all articles rel
ated to ureteral calculi published from 1966 to January 1996, Outcomes
data were extracted from articles accepted after panel review. The da
ta were then meta-analyzed to produce outcome estimates for alternativ
e treatments of ureteral calculi. Results: The data indicate that up t
o 98% of stones less than 0.5 cm, in diameter, especially in the dista
l ureter, will pass spontaneously. Shock wave lithotripsy is recommend
ed as first line treatment for most patients with stones 1 cm. or less
in the proximal ureter. Shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy are a
cceptable treatment choices for stones 1 cm, or less in the distal ure
ter.Conclusions: Most ureteral stones will pass spontaneously. Those t
hat do not can be removed by either shock wave lithotripsy or ureteros
copy. Traditional blind basket extraction, without fluoroscopic contro
l and guide wires, is not recommended. Open surgery is appropriate as
a salvage procedure or in certain unusual circumstances.