K. Nahas et al., CHOICE OF TESTS IN THE BIOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT OF NEPHROTOXICITY IN DOGS AND RATS - A STUDY WITH MALEIC-ACID, Comparative haematology international, 7(3), 1997, pp. 133-142
Urinalysis represents a useful tool in the evaluation of new pharmaceu
tical agents acting on the kidney, during preclinical toxcological stu
dies. In the present study, we studied the response of urinary creatin
ine, LDH, AAP, ALP, beta-GAL, GGT, NAG and protein excretion to a sing
le intravenous dose of maleic acid (25 mg/kg for dogs and 100 mg/kg fo
r rats). Enzymes were selected based on their association with renal t
oxicity and their localisation within the renal tubule. They included
lysosomal, brush border and cytosolic enzymes. In male dogs, increases
in enzyme excretion occurred within 2 h of maleic acid administration
, peaked 3 h after dosing, and returned towards, or to, predose value
at 24 h. Marked increases in enzyme levels occurred only for LDH and G
GT (10-fold or more). Additionally, there was a marked increase in tot
al protein excretion whereas creatinine excretion decreased. In male r
ats, the only major difference from control was a higher 0-24 h protei
n excretion rate (approximately 2-fold). Moderate increases were also
present for ALP, GGT and LDH ( < 2-fold). In female rats, there was a
marked increase in urinary excretion of proteins and LDH, GGT, NAG and
ALP (8-13-fold when compared to controls). There were only moderate i
ncreases (2-fold or less) in beta-GAL and AAP. Creatinine was unaffect
ed by the treatment. Histopathological examination of the kidney revea
led moderate to severe proximal tubular necrosis in dogs and minimal t
o moderate tubular necrosis in rats. Overall, urinary GGT, LDH, total
protein and creatinine concentrations are the most sensitive biochemic
al indicators of maleic acid nephrotoxicity in dogs. For rats, in addi
tion to LDH excretion, total proteins, NAG, GGT and ALP can be conside
red to be sensitive markers of renal injury. In the light of these res
ults and those reported in literature, it was concluded that the respo
nse of urinary markers of nephrotoxicity is heavily dependent on the n
ephrotoxic agent, the dose, species, sex and study design. Consequentl
y, a range of markers should be examined in order to identify the most
useful.