Sp. Herman et al., PRACTICE PARAMETERS FOR CHILD-CUSTODY EVALUATION, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(10), 1997, pp. 57-68
These practice parameters are presented as a guide for clinicians eval
uating the often delicate and complex issues surrounding a child custo
dy dispute. The historical basis of child custody and the various judi
cial presumptions that have guided courts are reviewed. The difference
s between performing child custody evaluation and engaging in traditio
nal clinical practice are emphasized. Issues that are common to all ch
ild custody disputes are presented, including continuity and quality o
f attachments, preference, parental alienation, special needs of child
ren, education, gender issues, sibling relationships, parents' physica
l and mental health, parents' work schedules, parents' finances, style
s of parenting and discipline, conflict resolution, social support sys
tems, cultural and ethnic issues, ethics and values, and religion. in
addition, special issues that complicate custody evaluations are discu
ssed, including infants in custody disputes, homosexual parents, grand
parents' rights, parental kidnaping relocation problems, allegations o
f sexual abuse, and advances in reproductive technology, such as froze
n embryos, oocyte donation, and artificial insemination. An outline is
provided that describes the complete evaluation process, from assessi
ng referrals and planning a strategy through conducting clinical inter
views, writing the report, and testifying in court.