M. Sailer et al., INFLUENCE OF TUMOR POSITION ON ACCURACY OF ENDORECTAL ULTRASOUND STAGING, Diseases of the colon & rectum, 40(10), 1997, pp. 1180-1186
Endorectal ultrasound is a well-established method of preoperative sta
ging of rectal neoplastic lesions. PURPOSE: This study was undertaken
to evaluate whether tumor site (in terms of height) and position (with
respect to the rectal circumference) have an influence on the reliabi
lity of endoluminal ultrasound staging. METHODS: From January 1991 to
May 1996, 154 consecutive patients with a total of 162 rectal tumors w
ere examined preoperatively using endorectal ultrasound, Apart from st
aging all tumors using tile uT/uN classification, tumor level and tumo
r position mere recorded prospectively. Neoplasms were subdivided into
low rectal (0-6 cm from the anal verge), mid rectal (7-12 cm), and hi
gher lesions (>12 cm). Furthermore, the lumen was divided into an ante
rior, left lateral, posterior, and right lateral position, and all tum
ors, apart from circular lesions (n = 9), were subclassified according
ly. RESULTS: Overall, we found 40 (25 percent) adenomas, 15 (9 percent
) T1, 29 (18 percent) T2. 67 (41 percent) TS, and 11 (7 percent) T4 le
sions. Overall accuracy was 78 percent, Staging accuracy for low recta
l tumors (n = 41) was 68 percent, whereas 76 and 88 per-cent of mid Cn
= 96) and high (n = 25) neoplasms were staged correctly, respectively
. The difference was not statistically significant. With regard to pos
ition, 47 tumors were situated anteriorly (77 percent accuracy), 42 in
the left lateral position (69 percent accuracy), 33 posteriorly (75 p
ercent accuracy), and 31 in the right lateral position (81 percent acc
uracy). Differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION
: Endorectal ultrasound is currently the best method for preoperative
assessment of the depth of infiltration of rectal tumors. However, rec
tal anatomy seems to affect staging accuracy in the lower rectum becau
se the structure of the ampulla recti renders endosonographic examinat
ion more difficult. in addition, endosonographic layers are less well
defined at this level, Both factors contribute to a Io Ner reliability
and predictive value of endorectal ultrasound staging in the lower re
ctum, although statistical significance was not reached in this study.
On the other hand, tumor position with respect to rectal circumferenc
e does not influence the predictive value of endorectal ultrasound.