C. Coursolle et al., DEHARDENING AND 2ND-YEAR GROWTH OF WHITE SPRUCE PROVENANCES IN RESPONSE TO DURATION OF LONG-NIGHT TREATMENTS, Canadian journal of forest research, 27(8), 1997, pp. 1168-1175
Long-night treatments (16 h) of 0 (control), 4, 8, 12, and 16 days dur
ation were applied, in August 1994, to four provenances of 10-week-old
white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) seedlings. This was to dete
rmine the shortest duration that would produce seedlings having accept
able morphological and physiological characteristics for reforestation
. The effects of these treatments and of the latitude of origin of see
dlings on the course of dehardening and second-year growth were studie
d Terminal bud burst, shoot and root dry mass accumulation, and frost
tolerance were followed during the spring, and terminal shoot growth w
as measured until August. Seedlings exposed to 0 (control) or 4 long n
ights exhibited significant amounts of damage in the spring. This dama
ge had occurred the previous fall or winter. Seedlings receiving 4 to
16 days of long-night treatments did not differ in timing of bud burst
the following spring, while the most northern provenance flushed firs
t (May 18) and the most southern flushed last, 4 days later. Seedlings
subjected to 8, 12, and 16 long nights exhibited similar amounts of t
erminal shoot growth, dry matter accumulation, and frost tolerance. Fr
ost tolerance of the 8-, 12-, and 16-d treatments during dehardening w
as unaffected by the latitude of origin of seedlings. Our results sugg
est that under the experimental conditions used, an 8-d long-night tre
atment applied in the fall would produce seedlings with the same morph
ological and physiological characteristics in the spring as a 12- or 1
6-d treatment.