IS CONGRUENCE BETWEEN DATA PARTITIONS A RELIABLE PREDICTOR OF PHYLOGENETIC ACCURACY - EMPIRICALLY TESTING AN ITERATIVE PROCEDURE FOR CHOOSING AMONG PHYLOGENETIC METHODS
Cw. Cunningham, IS CONGRUENCE BETWEEN DATA PARTITIONS A RELIABLE PREDICTOR OF PHYLOGENETIC ACCURACY - EMPIRICALLY TESTING AN ITERATIVE PROCEDURE FOR CHOOSING AMONG PHYLOGENETIC METHODS, Systematic biology, 46(3), 1997, pp. 464-478
The relationship between phylogenetic accuracy and congruence between
data partitions collected from the same taxa was explored for mitochon
drial DNA sequences from two well-supported vertebrate phylogenies. An
iterative procedure was adopted whereby accuracy, phylogenetic signal
, and congruence were measured before and after modifying a simple rec
onstruction model, Equally weighted parsimony. These modifications inc
luded transversion parsimony successive weighting, and six-parameter p
arsimony. For the data partitions examined, there is a generally posit
ive relationship between congruence and phylogenetic accuracy. if cong
ruence increased without decreasing resolution or phylogenetic signal
this increased congruence was a good predictor of accuracy, If congrue
nce increased as a result of poor resolution, the degree of congruence
was not a good predictor of accuracy. For all sets of data partitions
, six-parameter parsimony methods show a consistently positive relatio
nship between congruence and accuracy. Unlike successive weighting, si
x-parameter parsimony methods were not strongly influenced by the star
ting tree.