IS CONGRUENCE BETWEEN DATA PARTITIONS A RELIABLE PREDICTOR OF PHYLOGENETIC ACCURACY - EMPIRICALLY TESTING AN ITERATIVE PROCEDURE FOR CHOOSING AMONG PHYLOGENETIC METHODS

Authors
Citation
Cw. Cunningham, IS CONGRUENCE BETWEEN DATA PARTITIONS A RELIABLE PREDICTOR OF PHYLOGENETIC ACCURACY - EMPIRICALLY TESTING AN ITERATIVE PROCEDURE FOR CHOOSING AMONG PHYLOGENETIC METHODS, Systematic biology, 46(3), 1997, pp. 464-478
Citations number
71
Categorie Soggetti
Biology Miscellaneous
Journal title
ISSN journal
10635157
Volume
46
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
464 - 478
Database
ISI
SICI code
1063-5157(1997)46:3<464:ICBDPA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The relationship between phylogenetic accuracy and congruence between data partitions collected from the same taxa was explored for mitochon drial DNA sequences from two well-supported vertebrate phylogenies. An iterative procedure was adopted whereby accuracy, phylogenetic signal , and congruence were measured before and after modifying a simple rec onstruction model, Equally weighted parsimony. These modifications inc luded transversion parsimony successive weighting, and six-parameter p arsimony. For the data partitions examined, there is a generally posit ive relationship between congruence and phylogenetic accuracy. if cong ruence increased without decreasing resolution or phylogenetic signal this increased congruence was a good predictor of accuracy, If congrue nce increased as a result of poor resolution, the degree of congruence was not a good predictor of accuracy. For all sets of data partitions , six-parameter parsimony methods show a consistently positive relatio nship between congruence and accuracy. Unlike successive weighting, si x-parameter parsimony methods were not strongly influenced by the star ting tree.