ACARBOSE IN AMBULATORY TREATMENT OF NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS ASSOCIATED TO IMMINENT SULFONYLUREA FAILURE - A RANDOMIZED-MULTICENTRIC TRIAL IN PRIMARY HEALTH-CARE
B. Costa et al., ACARBOSE IN AMBULATORY TREATMENT OF NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS ASSOCIATED TO IMMINENT SULFONYLUREA FAILURE - A RANDOMIZED-MULTICENTRIC TRIAL IN PRIMARY HEALTH-CARE, Diabetes research and clinical practice, 38(1), 1997, pp. 33-40
To assess the efficacy and safety of acarbose as an adjunct to high su
lfonylurea (SU) doses in patients with imminent SU failure, a randomis
ed, multicentric, 6 month double-blind, parallel and placebo-controlle
d trial was performed in primary healthcare. Entry criteria were: NIDD
M patients in concomitant dietary follow-up, age > 40 year-old, more t
han 3 years of diagnosed diabetes, baseline HbA(1c) levels between 8-1
2% (N: 4-6%), stable body mass index < 35 kg m(-2) and glibenclamide d
aily dose > 10 mg. After 1 month placebo run-in period all patients we
re randomly allocated into two groups of treatment (acarbose 100 mg t.
i.d. vs placebo). HbA(1c) levels, the main efficacy variable, lipid pr
ofile, fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels were performed an
d adverse events were also recorded. A total number of 65 patients wer
e randomised, 36 in acarbose and 29 in a placebo group. No statistical
differences were found on age (60.2/61.7 year-old), BMI (28.7/27.4 kg
m(-2)), glibenclamide dose (14.5/14.0 mg/day) and baseline HbA(1c) (9
.0/8.8%). Acarbose-treated patients significantly reduced HbA(1c) leve
ls (9.0/7.9 vs 8.8/8.5%; P < 0.01), based upon a marked decrease, but
statistically not significant, in mean postprandial plasma glucose lev
els (11.9/9.6 vs 12.4/11.1 mmol l(-1)). No significant differences bet
ween fasting plasma glucose and lipid profile were detected. A total o
f 31 patients (47.7%) reported adverse events, 20 (55.5%) and 11 (37.9
%) in acarbose and placebo treatment group respectively. Relationship
with drug was estimated as possible or probable in 16 (44.4%) of acarb
ose-treated patients. None of them were excluded from study participat
ion due to insulin requirement. Only seven patients (10.7%), six with
acarbose (16.6%) and one with placebo (3.8%), withdrew the study becau
se of the adverse events. Thus, acarbose seems to be a useful option i
n order to improve HbA(1c) levels in non-insulin-dependent diabetes me
llitus with imminent sulfonylurea failure. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science I
reland Ltd.