The doctrine of the separation of powers at almost universal support a
s a central element of the liberal constitution designed to protect ci
tizens against governmental power. However, there is little agreement
on, or analysis of, the precise institutional requirements of the doct
rine or the method by which the claimed benefit is achieved. We set ou
t a simple model of the interaction between citizens-voters, the legis
lature and the executive to illustrate that the functional division of
powers can operate systematically against the interests of citizen-vo
ters. This case provides the basis both for a taxonomy of distinct sen
ses of the separation of powers, and for the revisionist claim that th
ere is a general liberal presumption against the functional separation
of powers.