C. Calpin et al., EFFECTIVENESS OF PROPHYLACTIC INHALED STEROIDS IN CHILDHOOD ASTHMA - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE, Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 100(4), 1997, pp. 452-457
Background: There has been no systematic appraisal of the evidence reg
arding the effectiveness of prophylactic inhaled steroids in childhood
asthma, Objective: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of prophyl
actic inhaled steroids in childhood asthma. Methods: A MEDLINE search
from January-1966 through December 1996 was used to identify pertinent
English-language publications, All randomized, double-blind, placebo-
controlled trials of prophylactic inhaled steroid therapy for childhoo
d asthma that included data on clinical outcomes (symptom scores and c
oncomitant drug use) or laboratory outcomes (peak expiratory how rate)
were included. Results: In total, 24 of 93 studies retrieved met the
inclusion criteria, The overall weighted relative improvement in mean
total symptom score (inhaled steroid vs placebo) was 50% (95% confiden
ce interval [CI]: 49%, 51%), the overall weighted relative decrease in
mean concomitant beta(2)-agonist use (inhaled steroid vs placebo) was
37% (95% CI: 36%, 38%), and the overall weighted relative decrease in
mean concomitant oral steroid use (inhaled steroid vs placebo) was 68
% (95% CI: 66%, 70%). The overall weighted absolute improvement in mea
n peak expiratory flow rate (inhaled steroid vs placebo) was 38 L/min
(95% CI: 34.3 L/min, 41.7 L/min). Conclusions: Prophylactic inhaled st
eroids are effective, compared with placebo, in improving both clinica
l and laboratory outcomes in childhood asthma.