K. Anthonisen et al., BROOD DIVISION IS ASSOCIATED WITH FLEDGLING DISPERSION IN THE BLUETHROAT (LUSCINIA S. SVECICA), The Auk, 114(4), 1997, pp. 553-561
In many bird species with biparental care, each parent takes the exclu
sive care of some of the young after fledging. Some of the hypotheses
that have been put forth to explain brood division behavior state that
it is advantageous for a particular parent to care for a particular '
'type'' of young, e.g. with respect to sex, size, or parentage. Other
hypotheses claim a benefit to the parents (e.g. reduced foraging costs
or risks of predation) only when the young are spatially dispersed. I
n this paper, we describe brood division in a Norwegian population of
Bluethroats (Luscinia s. svecica). In general, brood division arose on
ce the young became spatially dispersed after fledging. The only excep
tions to the rule occurred when the male was polygynous and provisione
d the young at a low rate. No brood division was found when the young
were still in the nest, nor when they were physically prevented from s
pacing out by an enclosure around the nest. Young fed by the same pare
nt were more clustered than young fed by different parents. Experiment
al switching of young among single-parent groups suggested that parent
s were able to recognize individual offspring outside the nest. Howeve
r, there were no indications that parents divided the brood by sex, si
ze, or genetic parentage. Our data are consistent with hypotheses that
assume a parental benefit from brood division when the young are spat
ially dispersed. .