We compared laying date, nesting success, clutch size, and productivit
y of four bird species that nest in boxes and tree cavities to examine
whether data from nest boxes are comparable with data from tree cavit
ies. Western Bluebirds (Sialia mexicana) gained the most advantage fro
m nesting in boxes. They initialed egg laying earlier, had higher nest
ing success, lower predation rates, and fledged marginally more young
in boxes than in cavities but did not have larger clutches or hatch mo
re eggs. Plain Titmice (Parus inornatus) nesting in boxes had marginal
ly lower predation rates, hatched more eggs, and fledged more young. T
hey did not have higher overall nesting success, nor did they initiate
clutches significantly earlier in boxes. House Wrens (Troglodytes aed
on) nesting in boxes laid larger clutches, hatched more eggs, and fled
ged more young and had marginally higher nesting success and lower pre
dation rates. Ash-throated Flycatchers (Myiarchus cinerascens) experie
nced no apparent benefits from nesting in boxes versus cavities, No si
gnificant relationships were found between clutch size and bottom area
or volume of cavities for any of these species. These results suggest
that researchers should use caution when extrapolating results from n
est-box studies of reproductive success, predation rates, and producti
vity of cavity-nesting birds. Given the different responses of these f
our species to nesting in boxes, the effects of the addition of nest b
oxes on community structure also should be considered.