Xh. Shen et al., QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF THE HYDROPHOBIC INTERACTION MECHANISM BETWEEN UREA AND MOLECULAR PROBES USED IN SENSING SOME MICROHETEROGENEOUS MEDIA, JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 101(41), 1997, pp. 8212-8220
The interactions of 2-phenyl-3,3-dimethyl-3H-indole (1), laminophenyl)
-3,3-dimethyl-5-carboethoxy-3H-indole (3) and 2-(p-aminophenyl)-3,3-di
methyl-5-cyano-3H-indole (4) with SDS micelles and of 3 and -aminophen
yl)-3,3-dimethyl-5-carboethoxy-3H-indole (2) with aqueous solutions of
beta-cyclodextrin CB-CD) in the absence and presence of urea, respect
ively, were studied by absorption and steady-state fluorescence measur
ements. It was found that the microviscosity of the interface of sodiu
m dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelle sensed by 1 increases greatly, while t
he change in the micropolarity of the interface sensed by 4 is negligi
ble with increasing the urea concentration. The estimated critical mic
ellar concentration (cmc) of the SDS micelle also increases with the u
rea concentration. It was also found that the binding constant (K-s) o
f 3 with SDS micelle is reduced by the addition of urea. The steady-st
ate fluorescence measurements of the stoichiometries of the guest (2 o
r 3):beta-CD inclusion complexes indicate that two types of complexes,
i.e., 1:1 and 1:2 types, are formed. The association constants, i.e.,
K-1 for the 1:1 complex and K-2 for the 1:2 complex, were obtained fo
r 2 and 3 in the absence and presence of urea, respectively. The data
reveal that the hydrophobic effect plays the major role in the stabili
zation of 1:1 and 1:2 complexes. The addition of urea gives rise to a
remarkable decrease in K-1 and a much greater decrease in K-2. For 2 i
n the presence of 5 M urea, the formation of the 1:2 complex is inhibi
ted completely. The effects of urea on K-s in SDS micelles and on K-1
and K-2 in aqueous solutions of beta-CD are described in terms of its
hydrophobic interactions with 2 and 3. Some more direct evidences abou
t this hydrophobic interaction in SDS micelles and the association con
stant between urea and 3 are also presented. The above results of the
hydrophobic interaction between urea and the 3H-indoles and of the ure
a effect on the micellar interface strongly support the direct mechani
sm of urea action, through which the mechanism of urea as a protein de
naturant can be understood better.