Although meta-analysis appears to be a useful technique to verify the
existence of an effect and to summarize large bodies of literature, th
ere are problems associated with its use and interpretation. Amongst d
ifficult ies is the ''file drawer problem.'' With this problem it is a
ssumed that a certain percentage of studies are not published or are n
ot available to be included in any given meta-analysis. We present a c
autionary table to quantify the magnitude of this problem. The table s
hows that distortions exaggerating the effect size are substantial and
that the exaggerations of effects are strongest when the true effect
size approaches zero. A meta-analysis could be very misleading were th
e true effect size dose to zero.