Endotracheal Intubation (ETI) is a valuable procedure which must be le
arnt and practised, and performing ETI on cadavers is probably the bes
t way to do this, although lesser alternatives do exist. Performing ET
I on a cadaver is viewed with a real and reasonable repugnance and if
it is done without proper authorisation it might be illegal. Some form
of consent is required. Presumed consent would preferably be governed
by statute and should only occur if the community is well informed an
d therefore in a position of being able to decline. Currently neither
statute nor adequate informing exists. Endotracheal intubation on the
newly dead may be justifiable according to a Guttman scale if the pati
ent has already consented to organ donation and if further research su
pports the relevance of the Guttman scale to this question. A ''mandat
ed choice'' with prior individual consent as a matter of public policy
is the best of these solutions, however until such a solution is in p
lace we may not practise endotracheal intubation on the newly dead.