Cr. Chudnofsky, SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF FLUMAZENIL IN REVERSING CONSCIOUS SEDATION IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, Academic emergency medicine, 4(10), 1997, pp. 944-950
Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of flumazenil vs place
bo in reversing fentanyl and midazolam-induced conscious sedation in E
D patients undergoing a short, painful procedure. Methods: This was a
multicenter, randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled st
udy conducted at 9 university-affiliated teaching hospitals. Patients
>18 years of age requiring conscious sedation for a painful procedure
expected to last <20 minutes were eligible for inclusion in the study.
Patients received 2 mu g/kg of fentanyl, followed by midazolam titrat
ed to the desired level of sedation, Patients were then randomized to
receive either flumazenil or placebo in a 3:1 ratio (flumazenil:placeb
o). Vital signs, O-2 saturation, and alertness were recorded at regula
r intervals. Prior to ED release, patients were asked to rate the amou
nt of discomfort they experienced and the level of relaxation achieved
on a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS, They also were questioned about
their recall for the procedure and satisfaction with the drug regimen.
Physicians also rated their satisfaction with the drug regimen on a I
O-cm VAS. Results: Overall, 133 patients received flumazenil and 46 pa
tients received placebo. Patients in the 2 groups received similar dos
es of midazolam. The patients who received flumazenil returned to base
line alertness earlier (11.1 min vs 24.8 min, p < 0.001) and at a fast
er rate than did the patients given placebo. Actual intervals from pro
cedure completion until release from the ED did not differ between the
2 groups (98.2 +/- 3.6 min flumazenil vs 96.9 +/- 5.8 min placebo; p
= 0.89). The amounts of discomfort experienced, levels of relaxation a
chieved, recalls for the procedure, and both patient and physician sat
isfactions were also similar for the 2 groups. There were no serious a
dverse effects related to the study drug, and minor adverse effects we
re similar for the 2 groups. Conclusion: Flumazenil is safe and effica
cious in reversing midazolam-induced sedation in ED patients given a c
ombination of fentanyl and midazolam to facilitate the performance of
a short, painful procedure, The patients given flumazenil returned to
baseline alertness earlier and at a faster rate than did the patients
given placebo. However, flumazenil did not alter the actual interval f
rom procedure completion until ED release.