It is apparent that from the work of the authors and many others, incl
uding the work of Rivard, Sledge, Zuckerman, among others, that radios
ynovectomy has an important role to play in providing effective treatm
ent of affected joints associated with rheumatoid arthritis and other
forms of arthritis as well as the hemophiliac joint. The treatment off
ers relief from the effects of recurrent joint effusion with an approx
imately 60% to 66% favorable response and from recurrent hemarthrosis
in the hemophiliac joint with an approximately 75% to 80% favorable re
sponse. The impact of providing radiosynovectomy as an alternative to
surgical synovectomy is seen, where postoperative side effects such as
joint stiffness are avoided, improved quality of life is repeatedly d
ocumented, and the cost savings in health care dollars, particularly e
vident in the hemophiliac joint in this relatively small population, a
re potentially enormous. With almost two million people in the United
States suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, the potential savings in h
ealth care dollars is also enormous. As with any use of in vivo radiop
harmaceuticals, the potential for radiation-induced damage exists. How
ever, with a 25 plus year record of use, more optimally configured rad
iopharmaceuticals, and the addition of maneuvers to minimize potential
joint leakage, the risk of radiation induced damage appears to be min
imal. It appears as though radiosynovectomy is an effective as well as
cost-effective alternative to surgical synovectomy and is becoming th
e procedure of choice particularly in the hemophiliac patient with rec
urrent hemarthrosis and synovitis who has failed medical therapy. It i
s also the procedure of choice in patients for whom surgery is contrai
ndicated because of the presence of clotting factor inhibitors. Copyri
ght (C) 1997 by W.B. Saunders Company.