EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRONIC GAMMA-RAY COLLIMATION

Citation
Je. Gormley et al., EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRONIC GAMMA-RAY COLLIMATION, Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment, 397(2-3), 1997, pp. 440-447
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Nuclear Sciences & Tecnology","Physics, Particles & Fields","Instument & Instrumentation",Spectroscopy
ISSN journal
01689002
Volume
397
Issue
2-3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
440 - 447
Database
ISI
SICI code
0168-9002(1997)397:2-3<440:ECOMAE>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Electronically collimated gamma cameras based on Compton scattering ar e gaining increased attention as the associated hardware and physical principles are further developed. To date, however, there has not been a direct, simultaneous experimental comparison between electronic col limation and mechanical collimation. This paper examines the relative performance of these two techniques at medium gamma-ray energies (0.1 - 1 MeV). A mechanically collimated (pinhole) camera was built and its performance was compared to an electronically collimated camera. Plan ar radioactive sources were imaged simultaneously by both cameras for identical periods of real time. Data are presented for several radioac tive sources of various energies and shapes, including a multi-energy source. Results using an iterative image reconstruction techniques are presented. Comparing critical performance measures such as spatial re solution and efficiency for the two cameras may highlight differences between them, but does not provide an unambiguous basis for comparison . A tool from estimation theory, the resolution-variance curve, was ap plied to analyze their relative performance. Additionally, data from t he two cameras were combined, creating a 'dual-collimated camera', and its resolution-variance performance was also examined. All data sets were also compared on a 'per detected photon' basis by reconstructing an equal number of events. Results showed that the pinhole camera perf ormed better at the lowest energy examined, 279 keV. At 412 keV, the e lectronically collimated camera performed best on a 'per detected phot on' basis, but the higher efficiency of the pinhole camera caused both cameras to have nearly identical performance when all the data was in cluded. At 811 keV, the highest energy used, the electronically-collim ated camera demonstrated superior performance. At all energies tested, the combined data set performed as well as, or better than, the best camera operating individually.