Mj. Duffy et Je. Woods, HEALTH RISKS OF FAILED SILICONE GEL BREAST IMPLANTS - A 30-YEAR CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE, Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 94(2), 1994, pp. 295-299
The purpose of this paper is an assessment of clinically evident syste
mic health problems associated with failed silicone gel breast implant
s. A computer search of the medical records of 2033 patients receiving
implants in the years 1962-1992 revealed that between 1970 and 1992,
200 women 14 to 75 years of age underwent secondary silicone gel breas
t implant procedures by a single surgeon. This allowed determination o
f the exact integrity status of 681 implants collectively placed in th
ese 200 patients between 1962 and 1992 and followed clinically for a m
edian of 49 months. The common indications for surgical reexploration
in these 200 patients were capsulectomy, open capsulectomy, or implant
exchange/removal. All patients had a minimum clinical follow-up of 6
months. Surgical findings revealed that 577 (85 percent) implants were
intact in 135 (67.5 percent) patients and that in 65 (32.5 percent) p
atients, 104 (15 percent) implant failures were found. The patients' m
edical records were reviewed with specific attention to diagnoses sugg
esting immune-related disorders, siliconoma, acquired nonbreast malign
ancies, metachronous breast cancer, and recurrent breast carcinomas. I
n this very select subgroup of 65 patients with silicone gel breast im
plants which had failed or were deteriorating, no excess of expected i
mmune-related disorders or malignancies was identified. Our 30-year cl
inical experience with silicone gel breast implants for augmentation m
ammaplasty or breast reconstruction failed to demonstrate that clinica
lly evident adverse health problems are incurred by those women who su
bsequently experience a silicone gel breast implant failure.