Id. Ladas et al., TOPICAL 2.0-PERCENT DORZOLAMIDE VS ORAL ACETAZOLAMIDE FOR PREVENTION OF INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE RISE AFTER NEODYMIUM-YAG LASER POSTERIOR CAPSULOTOMY, Archives of ophthalmology, 115(10), 1997, pp. 1241-1244
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical 2.0% dorzolam
ide hydrochloride with oral acetazolamide in preventing intraocular pr
essure (IOP) rise following neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser posterior cap
sulotomy. Design: A prospective,randomized, double-masked, placebo-con
trolled study. Patients: Two hundred ten patients undergoing Nd: YAG l
aser posterior capsulotomy. Intervention: Pretreatment with dorzolamid
e, acetazolamide, or placebo. Dorzolamide administration as a single d
rop (1 drop approximate to 20 mu L) 1 hour before capsulotomy. Acetazo
lamide administration as a single dose of 125 mg orally 1 hour before
capsulotomy. Results: At first and third hour postoperatively, IOPs an
d IOP changes from baseline were significantly (P<.001) higher in the
placebo group than in the dorzolamide or acetazolamide group. At the s
ame time, IOPs and IOP changes from baseline were similar (P>.50) in t
he dorzolamide and acetazolamide groups. No patient treated with dorzo
lamide or acetazolamide experienced an IOP higher than 30 mm Hg after
capsulotomy, but 15.7% of patients receiving placebo had an IOP above
this level (P<.001). Of patients receiving placebo, 5.7% experienced I
OP higher than 35 mm Hg. No serious side effects were recorded in any
of the studied patients. Conclusion: Topical 2.0% dorzolamide and oral
acetazolamide, given prophylactically as a single administration 1 ho
ur before Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy, have comparable high eff
icacy and safety in preventing IOP elevation following this procedure.