TREATMENT OF ACNE WITH A COMBINATION CLINDAMYCIN BENZOYL PEROXIDE GELCOMPARED WITH CLINDAMYCIN GEL, BENZOYL PEROXIDE GEL AND VEHICLE GEL -COMBINED RESULTS OF 2 DOUBLE-BLIND INVESTIGATIONS
Dp. Lookingbill et al., TREATMENT OF ACNE WITH A COMBINATION CLINDAMYCIN BENZOYL PEROXIDE GELCOMPARED WITH CLINDAMYCIN GEL, BENZOYL PEROXIDE GEL AND VEHICLE GEL -COMBINED RESULTS OF 2 DOUBLE-BLIND INVESTIGATIONS, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 37(4), 1997, pp. 590-595
Background: It has previously been shown that a combination of erythro
mycin and benzoyl peroxide is superior to either ingredient when used
alone in the treatment of acne. A clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide combina
tion gel might have an advantage over erythromycin/benzoyl peroxide ge
l because the former does not require refrigeration after it is dispen
sed. Objective: Our purpose was to determine the efficacy and safety o
f a combination clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel when compared with be
nzoyl peroxide, clindamycin, or vehicle gels. Methods: In two double-b
lind, randomized, parallel, vehicle-controlled trials, patients were t
reated for 11 weeks with once-nightly application of one of the above
preparations. Evaluations were performed at 2, 5, 8, and 11 weeks and
included lesion counts and assessment of global responses and irritant
effects. Results: A total of 334 patients completed thr study. AU thr
ee active preparations were significantly superior to the vehicle in g
lobal improvement and in reducing inflammatory lesions and noninflamma
tory lesions. The combination gel was significantly superior to the tw
o individual agents in global improvement and reduction of inflammator
y lesions and also to the clindamycin gel in reducing noninflammatory
lesions. Then was no significant difference in tolerance to the active
gels versus the vehicle gel. Conclusion: In the treatment of acne, to
pical clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide combination gel is well tolerated a
nd superior to either individual ingredient.