SCREEN-AIDED CO2 CONTROL (SACC) - A MIDDLE GROUND BETWEEN FACE AND OPEN-TOP CHAMBERS

Citation
Pw. Leadley et al., SCREEN-AIDED CO2 CONTROL (SACC) - A MIDDLE GROUND BETWEEN FACE AND OPEN-TOP CHAMBERS, Acta oecologica, 18(3), 1997, pp. 207-219
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Ecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
1146609X
Volume
18
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
207 - 219
Database
ISI
SICI code
1146-609X(1997)18:3<207:SCC(-A>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
We have developed a novel CO2 exposure system for natural vegetation t hat is a middle ground between Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) and trad itional open-top chambers (OTC). Screen-Aided CO2 Control (SACC) techn ology uses much less CO2 per experiment and per replicate than FACE an d is superior to OTCs in terms of its effects on microclimate. A SACC unit consists of a thin metal frame, a clear plastic ''screen'', and a pipe at the base of the screen through which CO2 enriched jets of air are directed into the unit. There is a gap between the ground and the bottom of the pipe and the screen is relatively short in comparison t o the maximum height of the vegetation. Our SACC units are hexagonal a nd enclose a ground area of 1.27 m(2). SACC works in the following way : 1) the screen breaks the wind and creates turbulent mixing within th e unit, 2) the mixing of the outside air with the CO2 enriched jets of air,generates relatively uniform CO2 concentrations within the screen ed-in vegetation, and 3) a fully automated system monitors CO2 concent rations and adjusts CO2 injection rates for each unit every ca. IO min utes to maintain preset CO2 concentrations. Twenty-four hour means of CO2 concentrations in the middle of a unit are typically maintained wi thin 1 mu l l(-1) of their set points. Spatial variation and short-ter m fluctuations in CO2 concentration are similar to those in OTCs and F ACE. CO2 consumption at our site is 5 kg CO2 day(-1) replicate(-1) for a total of ca. 30 tons per year for 20 elevated CO2 SACC units. Compa red to OTCs, SACC units have reduced temperature peaks at full sunligh t, minimal effects on solar radiation, reduced rainfall interception b y chamber walls, and freer access of small animals to experimental plo ts. We believe that SACC is the best method for exposing short stature vegetation to elevated CO2 when financial constraints do not allow fo r a properly replicated FACE experiment.