COMPARISON OF ENOXAPARIN, HIRULOG, AND HEPARIN AS ADJUNCTIVE ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY DURING THROMBOLYSIS WITH RTPA IN THE STENOSED CANINE CORONARY-ARTERY
Rj. Leadley et al., COMPARISON OF ENOXAPARIN, HIRULOG, AND HEPARIN AS ADJUNCTIVE ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY DURING THROMBOLYSIS WITH RTPA IN THE STENOSED CANINE CORONARY-ARTERY, Thrombosis and haemostasis, 78(4), 1997, pp. 1278-1285
A canine model of electrolytic injury-induced coronary artery thrombos
is and rtPA-induced thrombolysis was used to evaluate the relative ant
ithrombotic efficacy of enoxaparin (a low molecular weight heparin), c
onventional therapy (heparin or heparin plus aspirin), and hirulog (a
direct thrombin inhibitor), when used as adjunctive therapy during thr
ombolysis. After 60 min of clot aging, adjunctive therapy was begun at
doses which elevated APTT approximately 2-fold over baseline. Fifteen
minutes after the start of adjunctive therapy, recombinant tissue pla
sminogen activator (rtPA) was administered (100 mu g/kg i.v. bolus + 2
0 mu g/kg/min for 60 min). Adjunctive therapy continued for 1 h after
termination of rtPA and blood flow was monitored for two additional ho
urs. Enoxaparin (1 mg/kg i.v. bolus + 30 mu g/kg/min, n = 10 for each
treatment group) was the only adjunctive treatment that significantly
increased the total minutes of flow (143 +/- 25 min out of a possible
240 min, vs 54 +/- 25 min for vehicle, p <0.05) and decreased thrombus
mass (6.0 +/- 1.3 mg vs 11.8 +/- 3.2 mg for vehicle). Although hirulo
g (2 mg/kg i.v. bolus + 40 mu g/kg/min) did not significantly increase
the minutes of flow (120 +/- 27 min, p <0.06) or decrease thrombus ma
ss (8.7 +/- 1.7 mg) compared to vehicle, these values were not signifi
cantly different than those measured in the enoxaparin group. However,
the results with hirulog were achieved at the expense of a significan
tly greater increase in template bleeding time than that measured duri
ng enoxaparin treatment. Minutes of flow for heparin (50 U/kg i.v. bol
us + 0.6 U/kg/min) and heparin plus aspirin (5 mg/kg i.v. bolus) were
69 +/- 20 and 60 +/- 23 min, respectively; thrombus masses were 8.2 +/
- 1.3 and 7.3 +/- 1.0 mg, respectively. In summary, enoxaparin was mor
e effective than conventional therapy in this model in terms of vessel
patency and thrombus mass, and was as effective as hirulog, at least
at a dose of hirulog that only modestly impaired hemostasis. Therefore
, enoxaparin may prove to be a safe and effective alternative agent fo
r adjunctive therapy during thrombolysis with rtPA.