Nephrologists closely monitor biochemical measurements of adequacy of
dialysis and protein nutrition, but little is known about how patients
assess adequacy, We sought (1) to determine how hemodialysis patients
assess adequacy and (2) to compare patient assessments with objective
measures of adequacy, We performed a cross-sectional interview study
of 145 patients from two chronic hemodialysis units, Using a structure
d questionnaire, we asked subjects to assess the amount of dialysis an
d protein nutrition they were getting. Objective measures of amount of
dialysis (Kt/V) and protein nutrition (albumin) were obtained from ch
art abstraction, We found that only 5% of all subjects thought they we
re getting less dialysis than they needed, yet 41% were actually recei
ving inadequate dialysis (Kt/V <1.2), Even among the 60 subjects with
Kt/V less than 1,2, only 5% thought they were getting less dialysis th
an they needed, Similarly, 21% of all subjects thought they were getti
ng less protein nutrition than they needed, yet 28% had inadequate pro
tein nutrition levels (albumin <3.5 g/L), Even among the 41 subjects w
ith albumin less than 3.5 g/L, only 20% thought they were getting less
protein nutrition than they needed, In conclusion, patient assessment
s of adequacy differ greatly from the objective measures that nephrolo
gists use to assess adequacy, Most patients with Kt/V less than 1.2 or
albumin less than 3.5 g/L think they are getting adequate dialysis an
d protein nutrition, Understanding how patients assess adequacy may be
an important step in developing interventions to improve the adequacy
of dialysis and protein nutrition. (C) 1997 by the National Kidney Fo
undation, Inc.