Problem-based learning (PBL) could potentially contribute to four key
objectives in the education of doctors. (1) Motivating learning. Three
studies show that students studying PBL problems choose fewer topics
to study than those identified by the faculty, but one study of a crit
ical care rotation showed that students were motivated to learn over a
wider range of basic science topics than had been included in the bas
ic science curriculum. (2) Developing clinical reasoning. One study co
mpared methods of solving problems in PBL and conventional track curri
cula and suggested that PBL students work backwards from clinical info
rmation to theory, while conventional curriculum students tend to reas
on forward from theory. One study showed that computer searches provid
e knowledge for helping solve some PBL problems, and another study sho
wed that specific knowledge in emergency medicine correlated with test
scores. (3) Structuring knowledge in clinical contexts. A few studies
show that PBL students perform less well on basic science examination
s but better on clinical examinations. Educational outcomes, however,
have been assessed quantitatively mainly by the U.S. National Boards o
f Medical Examiners Examinations or by clinical examinations with smal
l samples. Only one study includes a power computation to assess type
LI error. There are no studies that examine how much variance occurs b
etween PBL programmes in their curricular methods and outcomes. (4) De
veloping self-learning skills. PBL students use a much wider range and
number of resources than conventional track students. There is only o
ne study comparing the knowledge of doctors trained by PBL and convent
ional curricula after the doctors have been in practice for a substant
ial number of years, and no studies of patient outcomes. Patient outco
mes need to be assessed with randomized controlled trials, and sample
sizes should be determined by power computations to avoid Type II erro
r. Four possible methods of improving PBL would be to derive national
and internationally accepted PBL curricula; to organize internationall
y accepted and psychometrically validated methods of evaluation; to de
velop attitudes among students and tutors to facilitate co-operative P
BL teamwork; and to teach group process diagnostic skills.