Mdc. Evans et al., SURFACE APPLICATORS FOR HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY IN AIDS-RELATED KAPOSIS-SARCOMA, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 39(3), 1997, pp. 769-774
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: The development of commercially available surface applicators
using high dose rate remote afterloading devices has enabled radiothe
rapy centers to treat selected superficial lesions using a remote afte
rloading brachytherapy unit, The dosimetric parameters of these applic
ators, the clinical implementation of this technique, and a review of
the initial patient treatment regimes are presented, Methods and Mater
ials: A set of six fixed-diameter (1, 2, and 3 cm), tungsten/steel sur
face applicators is available for use with a single stepping-source (I
r-192, 370 GBq) high dose rate afterloader. The source can be position
ed either in a parallel or perpendicular orientation to the treatment
plane at the center of a conical aperture that sits at an SSD of appro
ximately 15 mm and is used with a l-mm thick removable plastic cap, Th
e surface dose rates, percent depth dose, and off-axis ratios were mea
sured, A custom-built, ceiling-mounted immobilization device secures t
he applicator on the surface of the patient's lesion during treatment,
Results: Between November 1994, and September 1996, 16 AIDS-related K
aposi's sarcoma patients having a total of 120 lesions have been treat
ed with palliative intent, Treatment sites were distributed between th
e head and neck, extremity, and torso, Doses ranged from 8 to 20 Gy, w
ith a median dose of 10 Gy delivered in a single fraction, Treatments
were well tolerated with minimal skin reaction, except for patients wi
th lesions treated to 20 Gy who developed moderate/severe desquamation
, Conclusion: Radiotherapy centers equipped with a high dose rate remo
te afterloading unit may treat small selected surface lesions with com
mercially available surface applicators, These surface applicators mus
t be used with a protective cap to eliminate electron contamination, T
he optimal surface dose appears to be either 10 or 15 Gy depending upo
n the height of the lesion. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.