Rp. Woolas et al., FALLOPIAN-TUBE CARCINOMA - AN UNDER-RECOGNIZED PRIMARY NEOPLASM, International journal of gynecological cancer, 7(4), 1997, pp. 284-288
It has been suggested that primary carcinoma of the fallopian tube may
be more common than has previously been recorded. To investigate this
possibility further a clinico-pathological study was undertaken at Th
e Northern General Hospital, Sheffield. All cases undergoing primary s
urgical treatment for ovarian cancer at this regional Gynaecological O
ncology unit were reviewed by one pathologist. Between January 1994 an
d October 1995, 36 new cases of epithelial ovarian cancer were diagnos
ed at laparotomy. During this time period three women, all of whom liv
ed in the local catchment area, had a diagnosis of primary fallopian t
ube carcinoma established by accepted pathologic criteria. One case wa
s an incidental finding at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease
. Another presented as cervical lymphadenopathy, which contained metas
tatic papillary serous carcinoma, subsequently demonstrated at operati
on to be of tubal origin. Over a 22 month period the ratio of primary
tubal to ovarian carcinoma in our surgical population was 10 times tha
t predicted by national incidence figures. The manner of presentation
of two of the cases of tubal carcinoma raises the possibility that in
other circumstances they may not have been recorded as such. If primar
y tubal carcinoma is under-reported, there may be implications to the
nature of the procedure performed as surgical prophylaxis against ovar
ian cancer.