Lc. Decoster et al., PREVALENCE AND FEATURES OF JOINT HYPERMOBILITY AMONG ADOLESCENT ATHLETES, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 151(10), 1997, pp. 989-992
Objective: To determine the prevalence of joint hypermobility in a gro
up of adolescent, interscholastic athletes. Design: Cross-sectional; d
escriptive or observational. Setting: Free preparticipation physical e
xaminations for sports. Subjects: Two hundred and sixty-four athletes
(150 male, 114 female; average age, 15.5 years) comprised the entire s
et of athletes who came to our clinic for free physical examinations.
Intervention and Main Outcome Measures: We screened 264 athletes using
the widely accepted Carter-Wilkinson-Beighton method, which examines
range of motion at the knees, trunk, fingers, thumbs, and elbows bilat
erally and employs a 0 to 9 scoring scheme (5 = hypermobile). We also
used an ''injury allowance,'' whereby if an athlete screened positive
for only one side of a bilateral test but had a history of injury to t
he corresponding side, he or she was given an injury allowance point.
Results: Thirty-two scored 5 or higher, with another 2 screening posit
ive for hypermobility by the injury allowance, for a total of 34 hyper
mobile athletes (12.9%). There was a highly significant difference bet
ween sexes (P < .001), with 25 female (22%) and 9 male subjects (6%) t
esting positive. Conclusions: The overall prevalence of hypermobility
and the significant sex difference found in this group of adolescent a
thletes were similar to nonathlete populations of comparable age. Rese
arch on nonathletes has been relied on by many to recommend that hyper
mobile persons avoid strenuous physical activity; however, research on
athletes is less than conclusive. Given that a significant segment of
young athletes, especially females, may be hypermobile, prospective s
tudies are warranted to investigate this question before we can justif
y depriving hypermobile youths of the many known benefits of regular o
r strenuous exercise.