SKIN ABSORPTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CATALYST DIMETHYLETHYLAMINE IN-VITRO IN GUINEA-PIG AND HUMAN SKIN, AND OF GASEOUS DIMETHYLETHYLAMINE IN HUMAN VOLUNTEERS
T. Lundh et al., SKIN ABSORPTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CATALYST DIMETHYLETHYLAMINE IN-VITRO IN GUINEA-PIG AND HUMAN SKIN, AND OF GASEOUS DIMETHYLETHYLAMINE IN HUMAN VOLUNTEERS, International archives of occupational and environmental health, 70(5), 1997, pp. 309-313
Objectives: The aims of the study were threefold: to assess the skin u
ptake of the industrial catalyst dimethylethylamine (DMEA) (a) in vitr
o from water solutions by fresh guinea-pig and human skin specimens, (
b) in gaseous form in vivo in human volunteers, and (c) to estimate th
e relevance of the uptake as an occupational hazard. Methods: Specimen
s from the in vitro and in vivo experiments were analysed by gas chrom
atography using a nitrogen-sensitive detector. Design: DMEA, diluted w
ith water or isotonic saline solution was applied to fresh human or gu
inea-pig skin, mounted in Teflon flow-through cells with a perfusion f
luid flow rate of 1.5 ml/h, samples being collected at 2-h intervals f
or 48 h. Three healthy male volunteers each had their right forearm ex
posed (in a Plexiglass chamber) for 4 h to DMEA at each of three diffe
rent levels (250, 500 and 1000 mg/m(3) air). Urine was collected up to
24 h after the start of each experiment. Results: DMEA penetrated bot
h guinea-pig and human skin. The median steady-state flux and permeabi
lity coefficient (K-p) values, were 0.009 mg/cm(2) x h and 0.001cm/h,
respectively for guinea-pig skin, and 0.017 mg/cm(2) x h and 0.003 cm/
h, respectively, for human skin. The median uptake in the three volunt
eers at the different DMEA exposure levels (250, 500 or 1000 mg/m(3))
was 44, 64 and 88 mu g, respectively. The median K, for all experiment
s was 0.037 cm/h. Conclusion: Uptake of DMEA through the skin is of fa
r less importance than simultaneous uptake via the airways. Thus, the
amount of DMEA excreted in urine is a variable of limited use for the
purposes of biological monitoring. Although a wide range of K, values
was obtained in the in vitro experiments, both for guinea-pig and huma
n skin, there was no marked difference in median K, values between the
two types of skin. The K, values were lower than those obtained for h
uman forearm skin in vivo. However, future studies of other tertiary a
liphatic amines may show the in vitro method to yield values predictiv
e of those obtained in in vivo studies.