P. Kluger et al., THE TREATMENT OF SPONDYLOLISTHESES WITH SEGMENTAL REDUCTION AND INTERBODY FUSION BY MEANS OF AN INTERNAL FIXATOR, Der Orthopade, 26(9), 1997, pp. 790-795
In spondylolisthesis with an indication for fusion and with a slipping
of more than 50 % at least a partial reposition should be reached in
general because the incidence of pseudarthrosis would increase with a
fusion in situ and a large disturbance of the spinal statics would per
sist. Hereby with almost all methods an enlarged operative morbidity a
nd often a longer fusion range has to be taken in account compared to
the fusion in situ. Therefore, in smaller slippages the fusion in situ
will be favoured because the disturbance of the statics is not so imp
ortant, that such an effort combined with such methods is necessary. I
f the operation method with small spondylolisthesis and pseudospondylo
listhesis allows the reposition without much effort and if the operati
ve morbidity in comparison with the fusion in situ is not higher, then
it is reasonable to fuse the cases with a spondylolisthesis Meyerding
grade 1 and 2 in the anatomic corrected position too. Because the spi
nal fixator we use fills out these criteria we combine the correction
of the position with the fusion also in cases of small spondylolisthes
is. The incidence of neurologic complications correlates with the amou
nt of the reposition distance and can be caused by preforaminal or ext
raforaminal lesions. The reduction of small malpositions could only pr
oduce preforaminal lesions. Using the spine fixator with its repositio
n instruments linked outside the wound and with it's uninhibited acces
s to the segment and to the preforaminal neural structures during the
whole repositioning these lesions can be avoided.