OPTIMIZING THE ZELDOVICH APPROXIMATION

Citation
Al. Melott et al., OPTIMIZING THE ZELDOVICH APPROXIMATION, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 269(3), 1994, pp. 626-638
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Astronomy & Astrophysics
ISSN journal
00358711
Volume
269
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
626 - 638
Database
ISI
SICI code
0035-8711(1994)269:3<626:OTZA>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
We have recently learned that the Zel'dovich approximation can be succ essfully used for a far wider range of gravitational instability scena rios than formerly proposed; we study here how to extend this range. I n previous work by Coles, Melott & Shandarin (hereafter CMS) the accur acy of several analytic approximations to gravitational clustering was studied in the mildly non-linear regime. We found that what was calle d the 'truncated Zel'dovich approximation' (TZA) was better than any o ther (except, in one case, the ordinary Zel'dovich approximation) over a wide range from linear to mildy non-linear (sigma approximately 3) regimes. TZA was specified by setting Fourier amplitudes equal to zero for all wavenumbers greater than k(nl), where k(nl) marks the transit ion to the non-linear regime. Here we study the cross-correlation of g eneralized TZA with a group of N-body simulations for three shapes of window function: sharp k-truncation (as in CMS), a top-hat in coordina te space, and a Gaussian. We also study the variation in the cross-cor relation as a function of initial truncation scale within each type. W e find that k-truncation, which was so much better than other things t ried in CMS, is the worst of these three window shapes. We find that a Gaussian window exp (-k2/2 k(G)2) applied to the initial Fourier ampl itudes is the best choice. It produces a greatly improved cross-correl ation in those cases that most needed improvement, e.g. those with mor e small-scale power in the initial conditions. The optimum choice of k G for the Gaussian window is (somewhat spectrum-dependent) 1 to 1.5 ti mes k(nl), where k(nl) is defined by equation (3). Although all three windows produce similar power spectra and density distribution functio ns after application of the Zerdovich approximation, the agreement of the phases of the Fourier components with the N-body simulation is bet ter for the Gaussian window. We therefore ascribe the success of the b est-choice Gaussian window to its superior treatment of phases in the nonlinear regime. We also report on the accuracy of particle positions and velocities produced by TZA.