Dukes' classification for colorectal cancer is easy to remember and ac
curate in estimating survival. The Japanese definition of early gastri
c cancer have some problems, since it includes node-positive cases sho
wing a worse prognosis. The aim of this study was to clarify whether o
r not Dukes' A tumor can be used as new criteria for early gastric can
cer. Using 217 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy and lymph no
de dissection for primary gastric adenocarcinoma, long-term results an
d cumulative survival rates after operation were examined. Patients co
nsisted of three groups: Group 1, 20 patients with node-negative tumor
invading down to the muscularis propria, Group 2, 175 patients with n
ode-negative tumor limited to the mucosa or submucosa, and Group 3, 22
patients with node-positive tumor limited to the mucosa or submucosa.
The 10-year survival rates for Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 patients
were 94.7%, 96.9%, and 85.1%, respectively. The survival rate of Grou
p 3 patients was significantly lower than that of Group 1 and Group 2
patients (p<0.05). The prognosis of patients with Dukes' A tumor (Grou
p 1 plus Group 2) was excellent, showing 10-year survival rate of 96.6
%. Mucosal or submucosal cancer brought a poor prognosis when there wa
s lymph node metastasis. Early gastric cancer would better be defined
as a Dukes' A tumor which includes node-negative tumor not beyond the
muscularis propria.