Ks. Khan et Pfw. Chien, SEIZURE PROPHYLAXIS IN HYPERTENSIVE PREGNANCIES - A FRAMEWORK FOR MAKING CLINICAL DECISIONS, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 104(10), 1997, pp. 1173-1179
Objective To describe a framework for generating therapeutic recommend
ations using seizure prophylaxis in hypertensive pregnancies as an exa
mple. Design A decision-making framework was built using: 1. evidence
of therapeutic benefit, with number needed to treat as the effect meas
ure; 2. baseline rates of the target disorder that the treatment was d
esigned to prevent; and 3. a treatment threshold, determined by weight
ing the potential risks against the potential benefits of the treatmen
t. Methods Evidence of therapeutic benefit (i.e. reduction in eclampti
c seizures associated with magnesium sulphate therapy in hypertensive
pregnancies) was determined by a systematic quantitative overview of c
ontrolled clinical trials. Baseline rates of seizures without magnesiu
m sulphate therapy were derived from a recent cohort study. A treatmen
t threshold was generated using estimates of treatment associated morb
idities which were weighted against the potential reduction in seizure
s from magnesium sulphate therapy considering the relative values assi
gned to these outcomes by obstetricians practising in our hospital.Res
ults The number of hypertensive women needed to be treated with magnes
ium sulphate to prevent a single case of eclamptic seizures varied in
a curvilinear fashion dropping from 1000 to 14 as the baseline rate of
seizures increased from 0.1% to 10%. The treatment threshold as measu
red by number needed to treat was 64 (range 57-77). The number needed
to treat for nonproteinuric hypertension was 1000 (95% CI 180-40,000),
whereas it was 32 (95% CI 20-57) for proteinuric hypertension. Consid
ering the uncertainty in estimation of the numbers needed to treat and
treatment threshold, magnesium sulphate therapy may be recommended fo
r women at high risk of eclampsia (e.g. severe pre-eclampsia) while it
should be withheld in cases at low risk (e.g. nonproteinuric hyperten
sion and mild pre-eclampsia). Conclusion While awaiting further resear
ch obstetricians intuitively make decisions about seizure prophylaxis
in hypertensive pregnancies. Our decision-making framework generated t
herapeutic recommendations by explicit consideration of the available
evidence.