Jlci. Esteve et al., MISOPROSTOL-3, MISOPROSTOL-4, OR MISOPROSTOL-5 DAYS AFTER METHOTREXATE FOR EARLY ABORTION - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL, Contraception, 56(3), 1997, pp. 169-174
A randomized trial was conducted including 287 pregnant women seeking
elective abortion to compare the efficacy of misoprostol given 3, 4, o
r 5 days after methotrexate for abortion at less than or equal to 63 d
ays' gestation. Subjects received 50 mg/m(2) methotrexate intramuscula
rly and were randomly allocated to self-administer vaginally 800 mu g
of misoprostol 3, 4, or 5 days after the methotrexate. The misoprostol
dose was repeated 48 and 96 h later if the abortion did not occur. Ou
tcome measures included successful abortion (complete abortion without
requiring a surgical procedure), and side effects. Eighty-six cases (
93%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 85%-97%) aborted in Group I; 90 case
s (92%; 95% CI 84%-96%) aborted in Group II (relative risk [RR] = 1.09
; RR 95% CI 0.38-3.14); and 89 (93%; 95% CI 86%-97%) cases aborted in
Group III (RR = 0.97; RR 95% CI 0.33-2.87). No significant statistical
differences were obtained for the success rates when misoprostol was
given days 3, 4, or 5 after the administration of methotrexate (p = 0.
97) nor with any of the characteristics oi the subjects. Complete abor
tion occurred in 265/287 (92%; 95% CI 89%-95%) patients. Twenty-two ca
ses (8%; 95% CI 5%-11%) resulted in failure. Side effects for methotre
xate were minimal while for misoprostol they were moderate. This combi
nation could be an alternative to surgical abortion or the use of anti
progestins and prostaglandins for medical abortion. (C) 1997 Elsevier
Science Inc. All rights reserved.