Am. Pantoja et al., A ROLE FOR CHLORIDE IN THE SUPPRESSIVE EFFECT OF ACETYLCHOLINE ON AFFERENT VESTIBULAR ACTIVITY, Hearing research, 112(1-2), 1997, pp. 21-32
Afferents of the frog semicircular canal (SCC) respond to acetylcholin
e (ACh) application (0.3-1.0 mM) with a facilitation of their activity
while frog saccular afferents respond with suppression (Guth et al.,
1994). All recordings are of resting (i.e., non-stimulated) multiunit
activity as previously reported (Guth et al., 1994). Substitution of 8
0% of external chloride (Cl-) by large, poorly permeant anions of diff
erent structures (isethionate, methanesulfonate, methylsulfate, and gl
uconate) reduced the suppressive effect of ACh in the frog saccular af
ferents. This substitution did not affect the facilitatory response of
SCC afferents to ACh. Chloride channel blockers were also used to tes
t further whether Cl- is involved in the ACh suppressive effect. These
included: niflumic and flufenamic acids, picrotoxin, 5-nitro-2-(-3-ph
enylpropylamino)benzoic acid (NPPB), and 4,4'-dinitrostilbene-2,2'-dis
ulfonic acid (DNDS). As with the Cl- substitutions, all of these agent
s reduced the suppressive response to ACh in the saccule, but not the
facilitatory response seen in the SCC. The suppressive effect of ACh o
n saccular afferents is considered to be due to activation of a nicoti
nic-like receptor (Guth et al., 1994; Guth and Norris, 1996). Taking i
nto account the effects of both Cl- substitutions and Cl- channel bloc
kers, we conclude that changes in Cl- availability influence the suppr
essive effect of ACh and that therefore Cl- may be involved in this ef
fect.