Bb. Sorcini et al., QUANTIFICATION OF MEAN ENERGY AND PHOTON CONTAMINATION FOR ACCURATE DOSIMETRY OF HIGH-ENERGY ELECTRON-BEAMS, Physics in medicine and biology, 42(10), 1997, pp. 1849-1873
The scientific background of the standard procedure for determination
of the mean electron energy at the phantom surface ((E) over bar(0)) f
rom the half-value depth (R-50) has been studied. The influence of ene
rgy, angular spread and range straggling on the shape of the depth dos
e distribution and the R-50 and R-p ranges is described using the simp
le Gaussian range straggling model. The relation between the R-50 and
R-p ranges is derived in terms of the variance of the range straggling
distribution. By describing the mean energy imparted by the electrons
both as a surface integral over the incident energy fluence and as a
volume integral over the associated absorbed dose distribution, the re
lation between (E) over bar(0) and different range concepts, such as R
-50 and the maximum dose and the surface dose related mean energy depo
sition ranges, (R) over bar(m) and (R) over bar(0), is analysed. In pa
rticular the influence of multiple electron scatter and phantom genera
ted bremsstrahlung on R-50 is derived. A simple analytical expression
is derived for the ratio of the incident electron energy to the half-v
alue depth. Also, an analytical expression is derived for the maximum
energy deposition in monoenergetic plane-parallel electron beams in wa
ter for energies between 2 and 50 MeV. Simple linear relations describ
ing the relative absorbed dose and mass ionization at the depth of the
practical range deposited by the bremsstrahlung photons generated in
the phantom are derived as a function of the incident electron energy.
With these relations and a measurement of the extrapolated photon bac
kground at R-p, the treatment head generated bremsstrahlung distributi
on can be determined. The identification of this photon contamination
allows an accurate calculation of the absorbed dose in electron beams
with a high bremsstrahlung contamination by accounting for the differe
nce in stopping power ratios between a clean electron beam and the pho
ton contamination. The absorbed dose determined using ionization chamb
ers in heavily photon contaminated (10%) electron beams may be too low
-by as much as 1.5%-without correction.