THE STABILITY OF FINE-GRAINED SEDIMENTS FROM THE FRASER-RIVER DELTA

Citation
Cl. Amos et al., THE STABILITY OF FINE-GRAINED SEDIMENTS FROM THE FRASER-RIVER DELTA, Estuarine, coastal and shelf science, 45(4), 1997, pp. 507-524
Citations number
77
Categorie Soggetti
Oceanografhy,"Marine & Freshwater Biology
ISSN journal
02727714
Volume
45
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
507 - 524
Database
ISI
SICI code
0272-7714(1997)45:4<507:TSOFSF>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
The stability and erodibility of benthic fine-grained sediments on the foreshore and upper foreslope of the Fraser River delta were measured using the in situ benthic flume-Sea Carousel. The erosion threshold [ tau(c)(0)], which varied between 0.11 and 0.50 Pa, was inversely relat ed to erosion rate. It was also proportional to sediment wet bulk dens ity (rho(b)) in the form: tau(c)(0) = 7 x 10(-4) rho(b) 0.47. This tre nd agreed with those obtained from four other sites across Canada that encompassed a wide range in sediment densities: 1000 > rho(b) < 2000 kg m(-3). Erosion threshold Shields parameter (theta(c)) was positivel y related to grain Reynolds number over the silt-clay size range (0.01 < R-e < 5): theta(c) = 2.86 R-e(0.58). This was similar to earlier fi ndings for water-saturated sediment. This trend is also in continuity with published threshold values measured in biostabilized sand (5 < R- e < 50). Three erosion types were observed: Type IA erosion was a surf ace phenomenon caused by the presence of a thin organic 'fluff' layer. It occurred at current speeds less than 0.3 m s(-1). Type 1B erosion (asymptotically decaying with time) characterized the mid-portions of each erosion time series, and occurred at current speeds of 0.3-0.9 m s(-1). Type I/II erosion (transitional) was largely found on the fores lope, and occurred at current speeds in excess of 0.8 m s(-1). The ero sion process began in all cases under turbulent transitional flows. Th e change from Type I to Type II erosion corresponded to the onset of t urbulent rough flows (60 < R-e < 70). This is supported by video obser vations, which showed Type I erosion to be largely the result of entra inment of small aggregates and flocs, whereas Type II erosion was the result of enlargement of surface irregularities, and subsequent underc utting and release of large aggregates. Mean erosion rate (E-m) was in dependent of either azimuthal current speed or bed shear stress. It wa s largely constant throughout each deployment and varied between 1.4 a nd 7.4 x 10(-4) kg m(-2) s(-1). (C) 1997 Academic Press Limited.