Orthodontists have traditionally viewed structural discrepancies as th
e major limitation of treatment. In reality, it is the soft tissues th
at more closely determine therapeutic modifiability. The boundaries of
dental compensation for an underlying jaw discrepancy are established
by pressures exerted on the teeth by the lips, cheeks, and tongue; li
mitations of the periodontal attachment; neuromuscular influences on m
andibular position; and the contours of the soft tissue facial mask. T
he ability of the soft tissues to adapt to changes in tooth-jaw relati
onships are far narrower than the anatomic limits in correcting occlus
al relationships. The tolerances for soft tissue adaptation from equil
ibrium, periodontal, and facial balance standpoints are in the range o
f 2 to 3 mm for expansion of the mandibular arch and even less for cha
nges in condylar position. Thus, analysis of the soft tissues is the c
ritical step in orthodontic decision making, and this can only be acco
mplished through physical examination of the patient. Although quantit
ative measurements cannot be rigorously applied, guidelines for soft t
issue assessment, with particular emphasis on facial esthetics, are pr
oposed. From this perspective, a contemporary philosophy of orthodonti
c practice is offered, with general indications and contraindications
for nonextraction, extraction, and surgical treatment.