USE OF URINE CORTISOL-CREATININE RATIO VERSUS ADRENOCORTICOTROPIC HORMONE STIMULATION TESTING FOR MONITORING MITOTANE TREATMENT OF PITUITARY-DEPENDENT HYPERADRENOCORTICISM IN DOGS
Jm. Angles et al., USE OF URINE CORTISOL-CREATININE RATIO VERSUS ADRENOCORTICOTROPIC HORMONE STIMULATION TESTING FOR MONITORING MITOTANE TREATMENT OF PITUITARY-DEPENDENT HYPERADRENOCORTICISM IN DOGS, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 211(8), 1997, pp. 1002
Objective-To evaluate use of urine cortisol-to-creatinine ratio (UC:C)
as a means of monitoring response to long-term mitotane treatment in
dogs with pituitary-dependent hyperadrenocorticism. Design-Prospective
uncontrolled study. Animals-101 dogs with pituitary-dependent hyperad
renocorticism. Procedure-Urine samples were obtained from dogs on the
morning an ACTH stimulation test was performed, and owners were asked
their opinion on the health of their dog to monitor response to mitota
ne treatment. Urine was assayed for cortisol and creatinine concentrat
ions, and UC:C was calculated. The UC:C was compared with post-ACTH pl
asma cortisol concentration. Results-Post-ACTH plasma cortisol concent
ration was used to categorize each dog's response to mitotane treatmen
t. The UC:C did not correlate satisfactorily with results of ACTH stim
ulation testing. Twenty-seven of 85 (32%) dogs would have been incorre
ctly considered as having received appropriate doses using UC:C. In ad
dition, 16 dogs that received overdoses could not be distinguished fro
m 29 dogs that received appropriate doses Clinical Implications-UC:C d
oes not provide a consistent, correct assessment of mitotane-induced a
drenocortical destruction. The ACTH stimulation test, although more ti
me-consuming and expensive, is recommended for monitoring response to
mitotane treatment.