This paper tests the permanent income hypothesis (PIH) for public cons
umption. Unlike private agents, a government is a representative natio
nal, infinitely-lived agent that usually faces no liquidity constraint
s. Thus, the expectation is that the PIH restrictions should not be re
jected for public consumption. However, using U.S. data, the paper is
unable to find evidence supporting the permanent income model of publi
c consumption. Public consumption is found to be sensitive to lagged p
ublic income and too smooth relative to permanent public income. The r
esults therefore cast doubt on the characterization of the public sect
or as a social welfare optimizing agent.