PROSTAGLANDIN E-2 RECEPTOR SUBTYPE EP2 GENE-EXPRESSION IN THE MOUSE UTERUS COINCIDES WITH DIFFERENTIATION OF THE LUMINAL EPITHELIUM FOR IMPLANTATION

Authors
Citation
H. Lim et Sk. Dey, PROSTAGLANDIN E-2 RECEPTOR SUBTYPE EP2 GENE-EXPRESSION IN THE MOUSE UTERUS COINCIDES WITH DIFFERENTIATION OF THE LUMINAL EPITHELIUM FOR IMPLANTATION, Endocrinology, 138(11), 1997, pp. 4599-4606
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism
Journal title
ISSN journal
00137227
Volume
138
Issue
11
Year of publication
1997
Pages
4599 - 4606
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-7227(1997)138:11<4599:PERSEG>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Among the PGs, PGE(2) is considered especially important for implantat ion and decidualization. Four major PGE(2) receptor subtypes, EP1, EP2 , EP3, and EP4, mediate various PGE(2) effects via their coupling to d istinct signaling pathways. Previously, we have shown that the EP1, EP 3, and EP4 genes are expressed in the periimplantation mouse uterus in a spatio-temporal manner, suggesting compartmentalized actions of PGE (2) during this period. In this study, we examined the expression of t he EP2 gene in the mouse uterus during the periimplantation period (da ys 1-8) and during experimentally induced progesterone (P-4)-maintaine d delayed implantation and its resumption by 17 beta-estradiol (E-2). We also examined its regulation in the uterus by ovarian steroid hormo nes. Our results establish that EP2 messenger RNA (mRNA) is expressed exclusively in the luminal epithelium primarily on day 4 (the day of i mplantation) and day 5 (early implantation) of pregnancy. In (P-4)-mai ntained delayed implanting mice, EP2 mRNA was present in the luminal e pithelium, and the expression was further enhanced regardless of the l ocation of the blastocysts after reinitiation of implantation. This ob servation suggests little or no embryonic influence in regulating EP2 expression and, instead, shows its regulation by P-4 and E-2. Indeed, treatment with E-2 and/or P-4 exhibited unique regulation of this gene . The treatment of adult ovariectomized mice with E-2 down-regulated t he basal levels of EP2 mRNA, whereas that with P-4 up-regulated its le vels in the luminal epithelium. The up-regulation of EP2 mRNA levels b y P-4 was further augmented by superimposition of the E-2 treatment, s ug gesting a synergistic interaction between E-2 and P-4 in regulating this gene in the uterus. Collectively, the results suggest that EP2 c ould be a potential mediator of PGE(2) actions in regulating luminal e pithelial differentiation and serve as a marker for uterine receptivit y for implantation.