COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR YIELD ASSESSMENT OF MULTIPLE RESERVOIR SYSTEMS

Citation
Gc. Dandy et al., COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR YIELD ASSESSMENT OF MULTIPLE RESERVOIR SYSTEMS, Journal of water resources planning and management, 123(6), 1997, pp. 350-358
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Civil","Water Resources
ISSN journal
07339496
Volume
123
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
350 - 358
Database
ISI
SICI code
0733-9496(1997)123:6<350:COMFYA>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
This paper compares four different methods for estimating the yield of a multiple reservoir system. These include simulation, a combined sim ulation-optimization model (WATHNET), a full optimization model, and a simplified optimization model called the yield model. Simulation is u sed widely in practice and provides a good approximation of the behavi or of the system but requires a set of operating rules to be specified , The optimization methods automatically determine operating rules and are therefore quite useful in estimating the yield of a new system th at has not yet been operated. The four methods are used to estimate th e safe historical yield of the Canberra water supply system (Australia ). It was found that the full optimization model and the yield model p rovide high estimates of the system yield because they assume perfect knowledge of future inflows. WATHNET presents a reasonable compromise in estimating the system yield using implied operating rules that are achievable in practice.