Background: Biting on the silicone tube and pilot balloon of the laryn
geal mask airway (LMA) may obstruct or damage them with the teeth and
a bite block is recommended. The recommended bite block is a wad of ga
uze swabs rolled into a cylindrical shape and placed alongside the LMA
. It is considered that this avoids irritating the posterior pharyngea
l wall and damage to teeth whilst supporting the LMA tube when taped t
o it. The Guedel airway is commonly used as a bite block with the trac
heal tube and many anaesthetists also use it with the LMA. The aim of
the following study was to compare rolled gauze swabs with a Guedel ai
rway as a bite block for the LMA. Methods: We compared the Guedel airw
ay with rolled gauze swabs as a bite block for the laryngeal mask airw
ay (LMA) in 120 ventilated patients in whom cuff pressures were limite
d to 5.87 kPa (60 cm H2O) and anaesthesia management was standardised.
Results: In the Guedel airway group, there was a higher incidence of
ventilatory problems (0 vs 4, P<0.05), bleeding (0 vs 8, P<0.01), hoar
seness (0 vs 4, P<0.05) and sore throat (2 vs 12, P<0.01). Conclusion:
1. The Guedel airway is an unsuitable bite block for the LMA. 2. Cuff
pressure Limitation is compatible with adequate ventilation. 3. The c
ombination of LMA and Guedel airway probably prevents either from sitt
ing in the correct anatomical position. (C) Acta Anaesthesiologica Sca
ndinavica 41 (1997).