GRAFT-SURVIVAL AND RISK-FACTORS OF PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY FOR MICROBIAL KERATITIS

Citation
Ja. Lomholt et N. Ehlers, GRAFT-SURVIVAL AND RISK-FACTORS OF PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY FOR MICROBIAL KERATITIS, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 75(4), 1997, pp. 418-422
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Ophthalmology
ISSN journal
13953907
Volume
75
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
418 - 422
Database
ISI
SICI code
1395-3907(1997)75:4<418:GAROPK>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate graft survival rates and prognostic factors in re lation to penetrating keratoplasty for microbial keratitis. Methods: T he records of 95 patients treated with penetrating keratoplasty for mi crobial keratitis during a twenty-year period were reviewed. Data were analysed by construction of survival curves using the Kaplan-Meier no n parametric method. Results: The overall survival of a clear cornea w as 72% after one year, 71% after two years and 52% after five years. A significantly lower survival rate (p<0.05) was found in the presence of preoperative local risk factors such as wear of contact lenses and trauma and in inflamed eyes. In contrast, systemic diseases like diabe tes, cancer or rheumatoid arthritis did not affect survival and neithe r did recipient age nor the degree of vascularization of the eye. Male donor buttons showed superior survival compared to female ones (p<0.0 5), while females seemed to constitute the best recipients. Recurrence rates of microbial keratitis postoperatively were 11%, 16% and 24% af ter one, two and five years, respectively. Corresponding graft rejecti on rates were 9%, 15% and 27%. Conclusions: Patients suffering from mi crobial keratitis have a relatively high risk of graft failure. To imp rove the prognosis care should be taken to minimize local risk factors . Surgery should whenever possible be performed on quiet eyes. The une xpected finding of a better prognosis for male donor buttons might sug gest the preferred use of male donors in patients suffering from micro bial keratitis, but the observation needs further documentation.