SEABED CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH TASMAN RISE FROM SIMRAD EM12 BACKSCATTER DATA USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS

Citation
Rd. Muller et al., SEABED CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH TASMAN RISE FROM SIMRAD EM12 BACKSCATTER DATA USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS, Australian journal of earth sciences, 44(5), 1997, pp. 689-700
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Geosciences, Interdisciplinary
ISSN journal
08120099
Volume
44
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
689 - 700
Database
ISI
SICI code
0812-0099(1997)44:5<689:SCOTST>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
We have developed an automated method for sea-floor classification for the South Tasman Rise, based on a SIMRAD EM12-backscatter (13 kHz) mo saic and 47 sea-floor samples. The samples have been divided into 3 di stinct groups representing: (i) thick blankets of foraminiferal ooze; (ii) mixed sediments comprising sand/silt/mud (turbidites/chalk); and (iii) outcrops of metamorphic basement and volcanic rocks. A total of 515 sub-areas, each measuring 32x32 pixels (similar to 4 km(2)) and re presenting the different seabed types, were extracted from the image f rom areas 128x128 pixels large, centred on the sample locations. The t exture of the sub-images was analysed by calculating grey-level run-le ngth features, spatial grey-level dependence matrices, and grey-level difference vectors in four directions. A total of 100 samples for each class and 18 feature statistics were chosen to train an artificial ne ural network to recognise the textural attributes and their variabilit y for each class. The performance of the network was evaluated first b y classifying the image sub-areas used for training, followed by class ification of the remaining sub-areas. Classification accuracies for th e training samples for ooze, sand/silt/mud and basement rocks are 98%, 98% and 91%, respectively, and 91%, 83% and 84% for the test samples. Subsequently, we classified a total of more than 20 000 unknown image sub-areas 4 km(2) large on the northern South Tasman Rise. The result agrees well with a visual geological interpretation of the sidescan m osaic as well as with a facies map of the area based on 3.5 kHz data. The success of a combined textural image and neural network analysis t o classify a sidescan mosaic, in the presence of noise and processing artifacts, suggests a wide range of potential applications including t he recognition of sediment textures and other objects in high-resoluti on, shallow-water backscatter images, and pattern recognition in remot ely sensed geophysical images for mineral exploration.