J. Mwanamwenge et al., CANOPY DEVELOPMENT AND LIGHT-ABSORPTION OF GRAIN LEGUME SPECIES IN A SHORT-SEASON MEDITERRANEAN-TYPE ENVIRONMENT, Journal of agronomy and crop science, 179(1), 1997, pp. 1-7
The adaptation of a number of grain legume species is being investigat
ed for fine-textured, neutral to alkaline soils that are unsuitable fo
r narrow-leafed lupin production. Canopy development and light absorpt
ion are important characteristics influencing crop adaptation. In shor
t season, Mediterranean-type environments, crops with rapid early cano
py development minimize evaporation from the bare soil and maximize tr
anspiration and light absorption, leading to rapid dry matter accumula
tion. In this study, the canopy development and light absorption of fa
ba bean, field pea, narbon bean and chickpea were compared on a fine-t
extured, neutral to alkaline soil in a dryland Mediterranean-type envi
ronment at Merredin, Western Australia. The principle factors determin
ing early canopy development of the above grain legumes were investiga
ted. Among the species studied, high rates of leaf expansion and large
leaves resulted in a high percentage of absorbed photosynthetically a
ctive radiation (PAR) and rapid ground cover as measured by the sunfle
ck. Faba bean had high leaf expansion rates (mean of 1.33 cm(2) d(-1))
and a large maximum leaf size (59.4 cm(2)), and hence, absorbed a lar
ge percentage of PAR (77% at 74 DAS). In contrast to faba bean, the me
an leaf expansion rate of chickpea was only 0.11 cm(2) d(-1), its maxi
mum leaf size was 6.9 cm(2) and it absorbed 43% of the PAR by 74 DAS.
The rates of leaf expansion for narbon bean and field pea were similar
to that of faba bean, but their leaves were significantly smaller tha
n faba bean and greater than chickpea. Both field pea and narbon bean
absorbed 58% of the PAR at 74 DAS. Rates of leaf appearance did not se
em to have a large influence on rate of canopy development due to comp
ensation between the number of branches and leaf size. In general, spe
cies with few branches developed their canopy faster than species such
as chickpea, which had many branches.