R. Stahlberg et Dj. Cosgrove, SLOW-WAVE POTENTIALS IN CUCUMBER DIFFER IN FORM AND GROWTH EFFECT FROM THOSE IN PEA-SEEDLINGS, Physiologia Plantarum, 101(2), 1997, pp. 379-388
A positive hydraulic signal in the form of a xylem pressure step was a
pplied to the roots of intact seedlings of Cucumis sativus L. and Pisu
m sativum L. Surface electrodes at three positions along the epicotyl/
hypocotyl recorded a propagating depolarization which appeared first i
n the basal, then the central and sometimes the apical electrode posit
ions and fitted the characteristics of a slow wave potential (SWP). Th
is depolarization differed between pea and cucumber. It was transient
in cells of pea epicotyls but sustained in cucumber hypocotyls. It was
not associated with a change in cell input resistance in pea epicotyl
s but preceded an increase in the input resistance of cucumber hypocot
yl cells. With the increased xylem pressure the growth rate (GR) of cu
cumber hypocotyls and pea epicotyls underwent a transient increase, pe
aking after 5 min. If the depolarization reached the growing upper reg
ion, it preceded a sustained decrease in the GR of cucumber hypocotyls
bur only a transient decrease in the GR of pea epicotyls. A temperatu
re jump in the root medium (heat treatment) induced a steep pressure s
pike in the xylem of the cucumber hypocotyl which showed similar elect
ric and growth effects as the previously applied, non-injurious pressu
re steps. We suggest that the observed differences in the electric and
growth responses between the species were caused by the closure of io
n channels in depolarized cells of cucumber but not pea seedlings.